Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 543 S.E.2d 688
  • 273 Ga. 644

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel was not deficient for failing to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument because “an objection may simply have highlighted the point being made by the prosecution” (cleaned up)
  • recognizing constitutional and statutory authority of trial court to reinstate one juror and remove another
  • noting that in some cases, “an objection may simply have highlighted the point being made by the prosecution” (citation and punctuation omitted)
  • explaining that where the trial court's charge fairly informed the jury when a homicide is justifiable and the defendant did not request a charge on the specific forcible felony, there is no harmful error
  • explaining that where the trial court’s charge fairly informed the jury when a homicide is justifiable and the defendant did not request a charge on the specific forcible felony, there is no harmful error
  • approving practice of remedying Batson violations by reseating jurors who remain unaware of party who struck them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.