Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 12/16/2009
Hall v. State
Citations
- 303 S.W.3d 336
- 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 9542
- 2009 WL 4840150
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review claim that he had right to have counsel present during post-indictment, defendant-initiated interrogations where defendant failed to make timely objection to admission of his inculpatory statements
- holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review claim that he had right to have counsel present during post-indictment, defendant-initiated interrogations where defendant failed to make timely objection to admission of his inculpatory statements
- holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review claim that he had right to have counsel present during post-indictment, defendant-initiated interrogations where defendant failed to make timely objection to admission of his inculpatory statements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinn, Hancock, Pirtle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pomier v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-10-21· cited 96×
- Oswaldo Javier Reyes v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-02-09· cited 43×
- Tholonaus Darrell Pomier v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-10-21
- Abraham Parra v. StateTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2015-04-09
- State v. Hayden HuseTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-03-06
- Timothy Paul Liner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-08-25
- Dominque Nashaun Parker v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-12-01
- Roy Michael Lightsey v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-10-13
- Parra, AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-07-24
- Stacy Marie Parsons v. StateTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2018-07-31
- Thomas Anthony Moore v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2025-08-27
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 2,626×
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1991-06-13· cited 1,818×
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-10· cited 1,480×
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court· 1986-04-01· cited 1,418×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Mendez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-06-30· cited 1,231×
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-18· cited 1,033×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- Patterson v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 1,013×
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-03-13· cited 942×
- Michigan v. HarveySupreme Court· 1990-04-30· cited 701×
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2009-05-26· cited 668×
- Pena v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-08· cited 605×
- Jasper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-11-28· cited 477×
- Swain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-11-02· cited 471×
- Aldrich v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-14· cited 343×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.