Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 859 S.E.2d 475
  • 311 Ga. 698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this Court “presume[d that] the trial court knew and applied” a holding by the Supreme Court of the United States because the case was decided before the trial court made its ruling
  • noting that this Court “presume[d that] the trial court knew and applied” a holding by the Supreme Court of the United States because the case was decided before the trial court made its ruling
  • in evaluating sufficiency of the evidence to support conviction, noting that defendant’s credibility as a witness was undermined by admission that he lied 9 to police
  • “Trial judges [ ] are presumed to know the law and apply it in making their decisions, absent some indi- cation in the record suggesting otherwise.”
  • “Trial judges . . . are presumed to know the law and apply it in making their decisions, absent some indication in the record suggesting otherwise.”
  • “Trial judges . . . are presumed to know the law and apply it in making their decisions, absent some indication in the record suggesting otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.