Skip to main content

Pierce v. State

Citations

  • 32 S.W.3d 247
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 100
  • 2000 WL 1701416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court's instruction to jury under article 38.23 and subsequent guilty verdict did not deprive defendant of right to appeal prior ruling on motion to suppress
  • holding trial court’s instruction to jury under article 38.23 and subsequent guilty verdict did not deprive defendant of right to appeal prior ruling on motion to suppress
  • finding a factual issue exists when there is evidence that controverts testimony of the officer that established probable cause leading up to the arrest
  • finding a factual issue exists when there is evidence that controverts testimony of the officer that established probable cause leading up to the arrest
  • “[Sjuch a finding cannot supplant the trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence”
  • “The statute that was the predecessor of the first sentence of Article 38.23 was enacted in 1925.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Womack, McCormick, Meyers, Mansfield, Keller, Price, Holland, Johnson, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.