Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 135 S.W.3d 178
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2690
  • 2004 WL 585397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e take judicial notice of the validity of blood spatter analysis and hold that the State was not required . . . to produce evidence on the first two criteria of Kelly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray, Vance, Reyna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.