Skip to main content

Madden v. State

Citations

  • 242 S.W.3d 504
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1802
  • 2007 WL 4404270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the disputed fact at issue “must be an essential one in deciding the lawfulness of the challenged conduct”
  • holding that the legal question of whether the totality of circumstances is sufficient to support an officer's reasonable suspicion is reviewed de novo
  • holding that the legal question of whether the totality of circumstances is sufficient to support an officer’s reasonable suspicion is reviewed de novo
  • holding that the legal question of whether the totality of circumstances is sufficient to support an officer’s reasonable suspicion is reviewed de novo
  • holding that when facts not in dispute support admissibility of evidence, disputed fact issue is not submitted to jury because it is not material to ultimate admissibility of evidence
  • holding that the right to an Article 38.23 jury charge is a statutory right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

525 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Madden v. State

73 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.