Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 923 N.E.2d 479
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 504
  • 2010 WL 1132124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the urinalysis report during the hearing concerning the revocation of Holmes’s home detention in light of Reyes
  • holding the Indiana Rules of Evidence in general and the rules against hearsay in particular do not apply in community corrections placement revocation hearings
  • holding urinalysis report was sufficient evidence to support trial court’s determination that probationer violated terms of home detention by consuming alcohol
  • Indiana Supreme Court has specifically stated the right to confrontation does not apply to probation revocation hearings “because they are not criminal trials.”
  • “[T]he Indiana Rules of Evidence in general and the rules against hearsay in particular do not apply in community corrections placement revocation hearings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bradford, Riley, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.