Skip to main content

Holmes v. State

Citations

  • 671 N.E.2d 841
  • 1996 Ind. LEXIS 100
  • 1996 WL 442752

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the confrontation rights guaranteed by our federal constitution and exceptions to the hearsay rule are analyzed separately
  • “When the jury recommends that death not be imposed, and the judge nevertheless imposes death, the sentence will not stand unless the sentence is appropriate.”
  • trial court properly refused defendant’s tendered instruction regarding voluntariness of statements made by him, including chanting “murder in the first degree” while in custody
  • trial court properly refused defendant’s tendered instruction regarding voluntariness of statements made by him, including chanting “murder in the first degree” while in custody
  • two murders; also (b)(1) (intentional killing during robbery) aggravator; death sentence affirmed
  • three murders; also (b)(11) (victim (two) under age twelve

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.