Skip to main content

Austin v. State

Citations

  • 222 S.W.3d 801
  • 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 2739
  • 2007 WL 1051429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that medical records of complainant’s siblings indicating that defendant had Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy was admissible under Rule 404(b) to show motive
  • concluding, in Munchausen by Proxy case, that medical records of complainant’s siblings were admissible under Rule 404(b) as same transaction contextual evidence
  • concluding that while half of witnesses spent “significant time” testifying about matters in medical records respecting extraneous cases, other factors weighed in favor of admissibility of that extraneous evidence and therefore trial court did not abuse discretion by not excluding it
  • finding that voluminous medical records of extraneous times the appellant repeatedly induced and falsified illnesses in her children could have affected the jury in an emotional way
  • applying Mosley factors when instruction to disregard was given after the State elicited testimony barred by trial court’s ruling on motion in limine
  • applying Mosley factors when instruction to disregard was given after the State elicited testimony barred by trial court = s ruling on motion in limine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leslie B. Yates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.