Skip to main content

Cooks v. State

Citations

  • 844 S.W.2d 697
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 168
  • 1992 WL 222180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if an abuse of discretion in authorizing restraint occurred, defendant was not harmed absent evidence the jury actually saw the restraint
  • holding that right to change of venue may be waived as matter of law by participating in hearings on merits
  • holding that right to change of venue may be waived as matter of law by participating in hearings on merits
  • holding that admission of fingerprint evidence during robbery trial was harmless given other evidence admitted at trial
  • holding that even if an abuse of discretion in authorizing restraint occurred, defendant was not harmed absent evidence the jury actually saw the restraint
  • concluding that any error in admission of fingerprint evidence from car believed to have been used in robbery was harmless given subsequent testimony linking car to robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maloney, Baird

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

377 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Cooks v. State

39 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.