Skip to main content

Archie v. State

Citations

  • 340 S.W.3d 734
  • 2011 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 796
  • 2011 WL 2200809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that portion of prosecutor’s argument was permissible because it was “a reasonable deduction from the evidence” and not improper comment on defendant’s failure to testify
  • concluding that, because improper questions during final argument were embedded within other remarks that invited jury to draw legitimate inference from evidence, magnitude of prejudice was “concomitantly diminished”
  • concluding that the magnitude of prejudice of improper questions was diminished because the improper questions were embedded within other remarks that invited the jury to draw legitimate inferences
  • holding that the trial court’s instruction to the prosecutor that he could not continue his line of argument and instructing the jury to disregard the argument because it was an improper comment on the defendant’s failure to testify was sufficient
  • observing that the law generally presumes a trial court’s instructions to a jury will be duly obeyed
  • explaining that mistrial is reserved for rare circumstances where objectionable action is so emotionally inflammatory that curative instruction is unlikely to prevent jury from being unfairly prejudiced against defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

206 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.