Skip to main content

Ex Parte Lane

Citations

  • 303 S.W.3d 702
  • 2009 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1750
  • 2009 WL 4825122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding improper argument during guilt-innocence phase of trial did not result in prejudice to defendant because evidence of defendant’s guilt was extremely strong
  • noting that evidence rarely excluded as prejudicial when gives \'context of offense'\
  • noting that evidence rarely excluded as prejudicial when gives “‘context of offense’”
  • granting new punishment hearing because counsel failed to object to testimony whose probative value in assisting the jury in deciding the appropriate punishment was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice
  • criticizing the prosecution for attempting to persuade the jury to convict the applicant based on an uncharged offense for which he was not on trial
  • criticizing the prosecution for attempting to persuade the jury to convict the applicant based on an uncharged offense for which he was not on trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Meyers, Price, Womack, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Keasler, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ex Parte Lane

13 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.