Supreme Court of Florida· 3/25/1959
Williams v. State
Citations
- 110 So. 2d 654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that collateral crime evidence may be admissible if it is relevant to a material issue in dispute
- holding that evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is properly admitted when relevant to prove a material fact in issue
- holding that similar fact evidence relevant to a material fact at issue is admissible except where the sole relevancy of the evidence relates to the character or criminal propensity of the accused or where the evidence is otherwise precluded by the rules of evidence
- holding collateral crime evidence admissible if relevant to a disputed material issue
- holding similar fact evidence of commission of a collateral crime is inadmissible to prove bad character or criminal propensity but relevant similar fact evidence will not be excluded merely because it relates to the commission of a separate crime
- establishing rule governing the admissibility of evidence of other crimes, .wrongs, or acts that has since been codified in section 90.404(2)(a), Florida Statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thornal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1,052 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Hugo Tejada v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 1991-09-20· cited 305×
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 241×
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-07-09· cited 212×
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 182×
- Straight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-19· cited 174×
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-10-16· cited 164×
- McDuffie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-21· cited 161×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- Sireci v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-10· cited 158×
- England v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-28· cited 151×
- Heuring v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-24· cited 147×
- Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-02-02· cited 147×
- McLin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-09-12· cited 146×
- Craig v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-05-28· cited 145×
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-01· cited 143×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-07-07· cited 140×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-01-29· cited 139×
- Swafford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-29· cited 134×
- State v. HatcherSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-06-25· cited 133×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lovely v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1948-08-10· cited 213×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1899-06-15· cited 157×
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1958-07-25· cited 83×
- Roberson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1898-06-15· cited 83×
- Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 35×
- Selph v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1886-06-15· cited 31×
- Gluck v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1952-12-22· cited 24×
- Langford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 23×
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1957-02-06· cited 19×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-01-07· cited 17×
- Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-05-19· cited 12×
- Winstead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-11-28· cited 9×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-05-02· cited 9×
- Hutchinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-03-28· cited 8×
- State Ex Rel. Copeland v. MayoSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-04-27· cited 6×
- Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1958-07-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.