Supreme Court of Florida· 2/14/2008

Doorbal v. State

Citations

983 So. 2d 464
2008 WL 382742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that claims are waived when an appellant “merely refer[s] to arguments presented during the postconviction proceedings without further elucidation”
recognizing that “[t]o satisfy the “enterprise” element of the RICO statute, the State must demonstrate that a defendant acted in concert with . . . [an] entity”
“[T]o merely refer to arguments presented during the postconviction proceedings without further elucidation is not sufficient . . . and these claims are deemed to have been waived.”
“For an issue to be preserved for appeal, it must be presented to the lower court, and the specific legal argument or ground to be argued on appeal must be part of that presentation.”
conclusory argument insufficient to support reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.