Supreme Court of Florida· 7/7/2005

Mansfield v. State

Citations

911 So. 2d 1160
2005 WL 1577910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

denying Giglio claim alleging witness lied by testifying that he did not expect to receive any benefit from testifying because the \postconviction court found there was no evidence that [the witness] was promised any benefit in exchange for his testimony\
“It is well established that an indictment which charges premeditated murder permits the State to prosecute under both the premeditated and felony murder theories”
“[A]n attorney is not ineffective for decisions that are a part of a trial strategy that, in hindsight, did not work out to the defendant’s advantage.”
rejecting Caldwell challenges to Florida's standard penalty-phase jury instructions
“Appellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise a claim which ‘would in all probability’ have been without merit or would have been procedurally barred on direct appeal.” (quoting Rutherford v. Moore, 774 So. 2d 637, 643 (Fla. 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.