Supreme Court of Florida· 7/7/1994
Griffin v. State
Citations
- 639 So. 2d 966
- 1994 WL 318674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence that defendant burglarized motel room shortly before stealing a car was inexplicably intertwined because it explained how the defendant obtained the keys to the stolen car
- stating that to prove its case, state was entitled to present evidence which paints an accurate picture of the events surrounding the crime charged
- discussing why other-crime evidence was inextricably intertwined, and thus, relevant as inseparable part of act at issue
- affirming the in the course of a felony aggravator when the murder occurred while the defendant was seeking to escape from the scene of the robbery
- in proving its case, State is entitled to paint accurate picture of events surrounding crimes charged
- \Griffin concedes that his possession of the automobile was admissible because grand theft was a charge the jury was considering.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
125 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-09-22· cited 140×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-01-29· cited 139×
- Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-09-03· cited 100×
- Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-02-14· cited 96×
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 93×
- Coolen v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-05-22· cited 85×
- Consalvo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-16· cited 84×
- Blackwood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-12-21· cited 70×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-07-03· cited 63×
- Peede v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-01-11· cited 58×
- Hartley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-19· cited 55×
- Victorino v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-11-25· cited 54×
- Dorsett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 51×
- Quentin Marcus Truehill v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-02-23· cited 49×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-01-29· cited 48×
- Gosciminski v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2013-09-12· cited 43×
- Henry v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-01-25· cited 40×
- Garzon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 38×
- McGirth v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-11-10· cited 38×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1959-03-25· cited 1,148×
- Vivona v. ConboySupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 351×
- Antares Aircraft L. P. v. Federal Republic of NigeriaSupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 174×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-08-25· cited 102×
- Illinois v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1985-01-14· cited 77×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-11-09· cited 58×
- Smalley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-06· cited 57×
- Erickson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-13· cited 46×
- Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 46×
- Harvey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-16· cited 37×
- Gorham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-07-19· cited 30×
- Tumulty v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-28· cited 29×
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-27· cited 29×
- Amoros v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-09-15· cited 27×
- Remeta v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-31· cited 26×
- Hornbeck v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1955-03-09· cited 24×
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-18· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.