Supreme Court of Florida· 6/7/2007

Bell v. State

Citations

965 So. 2d 48
2007 WL 1628143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[B]ecause we conclude that none of the [individual ineffective assistance of counsel] claims has merit, we affirm the circuit court’s determination that there is no cumulative error.”
“[B]ecause we conclude that none of the [individual ineffective assistance of counsel] claims has merit, we affirm the circuit court’s determination that there is no cumulative error.”
“[B]ecause we conclude that none of the [individual ineffective assistance of counsel] claims has merit, we affirm the circuit court’s determination that there is no cumulative error.”
“Questions of credibility are left to the determination of the circuit court, and provided there is competent, substantial evidence to support those credibility assessments, we will defer to that court’s decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.