Skip to main content

Valentine v. State

Citations

  • 98 So. 3d 44
  • 2012 WL 1722588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the claim that the defendant may not be competent at the time of execution where defendant acknowledges that the claim is not ripe for review since a death warrant was not issued and was being raised only for preservation purposes
  • “‘[M]erely arguing a conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence is permissible fair comment.’”
  • “[T]he presentation of more favorable testimony in postconviction proceedings does not render counsel’s investigation into mitigation deficient.”
  • affirming denial of initial postconviction motion and denying habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.