Skip to main content

Goodwin v. State

Citations

  • 751 So. 2d 537
  • 1999 WL 1186439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the harmless error standard set forth in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), remains applicable notwithstanding the Legislature's enactment of section 924.051(7), Florida Statutes 1999
  • holding the invited error doctrine prohibits a party from inviting an error at trial and then taking advantage of error on appeal
  • reiterating the harmless error test espoused in DiGuilio and applying it to cases not involving constitutional error
  • noting “it is necessary to determine whether the single improper remark, to which the trial court sustained an objection and gave a curative instruction, was so prejudicial as to deny defendant a fair trial”
  • erroneous introduction of out-of-court description by victim of her assailant was not harmless since this was a close case on the issue of identification
  • focus of harmless error analysis is effect of error on jury; question is whether it is reasonably possible that the error affected verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pariente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

263 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.