Idaho Supreme Court· 4/1/2013
State v. Hector B. Almaraz, Jr.
Citations
- 154 Idaho 584
- 301 P.3d 242
- 2013 WL 1285940
- 2013 Ida. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a lawyer is not ineffective for failing to anticipate a decision in a later case
- holding that a lawyer is not ineffective for failing to anticipate a decision in a later case
- stating that expert testimony relating in general to the proper interview and lineup guidelines did not invade the province of the jury
- focusing on whether the suggestive procedures leading to the identification stemmed from police action
- adding onto Biggers factors arising from system and estimator variables established by eyewitness science
- focusing on whether the suggestive procedures leading to the identification stemmed from police action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burdick, Eismann, Horton, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named State v. Hector B. Almaraz, Jr.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.