Ibar v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the identification hearsay exception applies only to victims and witnesses to a crime
• holding that the trial court erred in allowing several prior identifications to be considered as substantive evidence
• noting that the defendant's claim that the verdict forms should have indicated which aggravators the jury found had been addressed adversely to the defendant
• noting that the defendant’s claim that the verdict forms should have indicated which aggravators the jury found had been addressed adversely to the defendant
• stating that section 90.801(2)(c) applies to statements of identification made by a witness to a crime
• CCP proper where the victims were bound and one of the victims was beaten for more than twenty minutes before the murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).