State v. DiGuilio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an error is harmless when an appellate court concludes \beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict\
• holding that an error is harmless only if “there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction”
• holding that an error is harmless only when \there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction\
• holding that tape-recorded 911 call admissible as excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule
• holding that a comment on post-arrest silence is not per se reversible error, even though it is a \constitutional error\ carrying a high risk of depriving the defendant of a fair trial
• explaining that an error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where there is no reasonable possibility that the error affected the outcome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).