Carratelli v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a defendant alleging that counsel was ineffective for failing to object or preserve a claim of reversible error in jury selection must demonstrate prejudice at the trial, not on appeal.”
• holding that a defendant alleging failure to preserve reversible error in jury selection for appeal \had a trial that was presumptively reliable\ and that it was the trial whose result was being challenged
• holding that a defendant must demonstrate prejudice at trial, not on appeal.
• holding a defendant must show an actually biased juror served to establish prejudice under Strickland
• holding a defendant must show an actually biased juror served to establish prejudice under Strickland
• noting that appellate courts review “the trial court’s discretionary decision for manifest error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).