Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/8/2006
State v. Sawyer
Citations
- 279 Conn. 331
- 904 A.2d 101
- 2006 Conn. LEXIS 285
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding harm, among other reasons, because state repeatedly emphasized improp- erly admitted evidence in its closing argument
- finding harm, in relevant part, because state repeatedly emphasized improperly admitted evidence in its closing argument
- finding harm because, among other reasons, state repeatedly emphasized improperly admit- ted evidence during its closing argument
- finding harm because, among other reasons, state repeatedly emphasized improperly admit- ted evidence during its closing argument
- finding harm, in relevant part, because state repeatedly empha- sized improperly admitted evidence in its closing argu- ment
- “our holdings in sexual assault cases that prior sexual misconduct is viewed more liberally than other types of prior misconduct should not be disturbed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden, Katz, Zarella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- State v. SaucierSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-07-17· cited 151×
- State v. McKenzie-AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 90×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-11-13· cited 88×
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-05-26· cited 74×
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-08-15· cited 72×
- State v. RitrovatoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-26· cited 71×
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-09· cited 70×
- State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-24· cited 59×
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-16· cited 54×
- State v. George J.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-11-28· cited 54×
- State v. BeaversSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-02-17· cited 48×
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-11-03· cited 41×
- Hayes v. CamelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-08-07· cited 41×
- State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-03-26· cited 38×
- State v. CulbreathSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-08-18· cited 36×
- State v. CoccomoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-22· cited 33×
- Klein v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-12-21· cited 33×
- State v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-16· cited 32×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-10· cited 32×
Cites
84 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-07-03· cited 7,961×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals· 1975-02-25· cited 6,387×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- People v. CornellMichigan Supreme Court· 2002-06-18· cited 323×
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
- United States v. FernandezNinth Circuit· 2004-10-27· cited 242×
- United States v. James P. HornadayEleventh Circuit· 2004-12-13· cited 182×
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 182×
- United States v. Connie Sue Heater, United States of America v. Harvey Bernard John, United States of America v. Timothy W. McCoyFourth Circuit· 1995-08-16· cited 174×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-05· cited 159×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 153×
- Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 149×
- State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-03-19· cited 145×
- Russell v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-06-10· cited 142×
- State v. RuthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-06-10· cited 127×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-15· cited 126×
- United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruderEighth Circuit· 2004-03-02· cited 125×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.