Rimmer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence was insufficient to support HAC as to second victim because record did not show that the defendant \acted with extreme and outrageous depravity or that he inflicted a high degree of physical or mental pain\
• “Generally, rebuttal testimony is permitted to refute a defense theory or to impeach a defense witness.”
• “Generally, rebuttal testimony is permitted to refute a defense theory or to impeach a defense witness.”
• “[T]he trial court’s decision turns primarily on an assessment of credibility and will be - 17 - affirmed on appeal unless clearly erroneous.” (quoting Melbourne, 679 So. 2d 759, 764-65 (Fla. 1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).