Supreme Court of Florida· 5/29/2008

Jackson v. State

Citations

983 So. 2d 562
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that probation may be enhanced, either by extension of the period or by addition of terms
concluding that “the temporary absence of counsel, i.e., a partial deprivation,” is not fundamental error
holding that rule 3.800(b) was not meant to allow defendants “to resurrect unpreserved errors in the sentencing process”
recognizing that “denial of counsel” claims “remain subject to the contemporaneous objection rule; if not preserved at trial, they may be reviewed on appeal only for fundamental error”
recognizing that the “complete denial of counsel at sentencing . . . constitutes fundamental error,” but the “temporary absence of counsel” at sentencing is typically subject to harmless error analysis
recognizing that, in order to be raised on appeal, even a fundamental sentencing error must be preserved via either a contemporaneous objection or a motion filed during the pendency of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cantero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.