Skip to main content

Gore v. State

Citations

  • 784 So. 2d 418
  • 2001 WL 391698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are generally not cognizable on direct appeal
  • explaining that a mistrial should be granted only when necessary to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial
  • listing Gore’s “history of targeting young, attractive women who drove new sporty automobiles” among the trial court’s “extensive findings in support of the CCP aggravating circumstance”
  • listing Gore’s “history of targeting young, attractive women who drove new sporty automobiles” among the trial court’s “extensive findings in support of the CCP aggravating circumstance”
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion where defendant failed to show relevance and requisite similarities to admit evidence of collateral crime as reverse Williams rule evidence
  • mistrial not required where question brought out that defendant had an \intimate relationship\ with a thirteen-year-old girl

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.