Skip to main content

Salazar v. State

Citations

  • 991 So. 2d 364
  • 2008 WL 2678289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an appellate court reviews a trial court’s ruling on a motion for a mistrial for an abuse of discretion
  • stating it is within the trial court’s discretion to not give a curative instruction if it believes that doing so would bring more attention to the comment
  • trial court’s evidentiary rulings on admission or exclusion of evidence are reviewed for an abuse of discretion
  • “[T]he trial court had the discretion not to give a curative instruction if it believed that doing so would draw further attention to the improper comment.”
  • “[A]s to not giving the curative instruction, the trial court had the discretion not to give a curative instruction if it believed that doing so would draw further attention to the improper comment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.