Skip to main content

Hodges v. State

Citations

  • 885 So. 2d 338
  • 2004 WL 2303643

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[t]he presentation of changed opinions and additional mitigating evidence in the postconviction proceeding does not . . . establish ineffective assistance of counsel\
  • holding that claims of trial court error should be raised on direct appeal, not in a rule 3.850 motion
  • holding that claims of trial court error should be raised on direct appeal, not in a rule 3.850 motion
  • holding that the trial court did not err in rejecting defendant's motion to disqualify because the only basis supporting a well-grounded fear that he would not receive a fair trial was that the ex parte communications were improper, and this claim was rejected
  • finding that counsel was not deficient for choosing not to present mental health mitigation after receiving unfavorable reports from two experts
  • finding that counsel was not deficient for choosing not to present mental health mitigation after receiving unfavorable reports from two experts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.