Supreme Court of Florida· 6/1/1995
Hunter v. State
Citations
- 660 So. 2d 244
- 1995 WL 324080
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial court did not abuse discretion in finding defendant competent where there was evidence to support that resolution
- discussing the 3 factors to be considered in determining when a BOLO alert provides law enforcement officers with reasonable suspicion to stop an individual
- \Inseparable crime evidence is admitted not under 90.404(2)(a) as similar fact evidence but under section 90.402 because it is relevant.\
- relevant factors in assessing the reasonableness of a stop pursuant to a police-issued Be On the Look Out (BOLO) include: “(1) the length of time and distance from the offense; (2) route of flight; (3) specificity of the description of the vehicle and its occupants; and (4
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
162 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-10-14· cited 545×
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 331×
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-25· cited 172×
- Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 152×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-03-15· cited 151×
- Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-20· cited 143×
- Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-16· cited 128×
- Zack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-01-06· cited 120×
- Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-06-16· cited 116×
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-09-18· cited 115×
- Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 114×
- Woods v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-15· cited 108×
- Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-01· cited 105×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-10-01· cited 97×
- Kearse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-29· cited 93×
- Consalvo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-10-16· cited 84×
- Waterhouse v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-31· cited 81×
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-06-26· cited 79×
- Sexton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-12· cited 78×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-04-18· cited 3,197×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court· 1975-02-19· cited 2,695×
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 1,798×
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 1,385×
- Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 1,054×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1971-03-31· cited 927×
- Tedder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-11-19· cited 480×
- Johnson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1981-10-05· cited 332×
- Espinosa v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 324×
- State v. SchoppSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-03-23· cited 199×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-10-13· cited 175×
- State v. StevensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-02-07· cited 168×
- Hildwin v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1989-07-03· cited 166×
- Fotopoulos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-15· cited 155×
- Heiney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-02-02· cited 147×
- Heiney v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-15· cited 124×
- Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-03-26· cited 105×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.