Skip to main content

Hunter v. State

Citations

  • 660 So. 2d 244
  • 1995 WL 324080

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court did not abuse discretion in finding defendant competent where there was evidence to support that resolution
  • discussing the 3 factors to be considered in determining when a BOLO alert provides law enforcement officers with reasonable suspicion to stop an individual
  • \Inseparable crime evidence is admitted not under 90.404(2)(a) as similar fact evidence but under section 90.402 because it is relevant.\
  • relevant factors in assessing the reasonableness of a stop pursuant to a police-issued Be On the Look Out (BOLO) include: “(1) the length of time and distance from the offense; (2) route of flight; (3) specificity of the description of the vehicle and its occupants; and (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

162 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.