Skip to main content

Cole v. State

Citations

  • 701 So. 2d 845
  • 1997 WL 574741

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that witness’s statement that she “knew some history on” the defendant was “isolated and inadvertent and was not focused upon” and did not require a mistrial
  • stating that a motion for a mistrial should be granted only when “necessary to ensure that the defendant receives 16 a fair trial”
  • affirming denial of motion for mistrial based upon testimony that \was isolated and inadvertent and was not focused upon\
  • affirming denial of motion for mistrial based upon testimony that “was isolated and inadvertent and was not focused upon”
  • \John was conscious for several minutes while he gasped [for] air from a severed windpipe slow[ly] filling with blood.\
  • no abuse of discretion where trial court denied motion for mistrial after witness unexpectedly mentioned defendant’s irrelevant criminal history

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.