Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 904 So. 2d 370
  • 2005 WL 673686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review four issues that Parker raised on appeal because the claims of error were “bare-bones” and con-clusory
  • listing claims and citing cases in which the Court denied these and other claims
  • “[W]here the individual claims of error alleged are either procedurally barred or without merit, the claim of cumulative error also necessarily fails.”
  • “This Court has repeatedly held that it is not unconstitutional for a jury to recommend death on a simple majority vote.”
  • “As a general proposition, a defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on any well-pled allegations in a motion for postconviction relief unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.