Supreme Court of Florida· 1/6/2011

Franqui v. State

Citations

59 So. 3d 82
36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1
2011 Fla. LEXIS 1
2011 WL 31379

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the court must accept the movant’s factual allegations as true in a rule 3.850 motion to the extent they are not refuted by the record
recognizing that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to state a claim under rule 3.850
recognizing that “mere conclusory allegations” are insufficient to state a claim under rule 3.850
stating that this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the postconviction court on issues of witness credibility
reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments
finding, based on the same evidence presented here, that the circuit court had competent, substantial evidence—two separate doctors found Franqui’s IQ was above 75 on the rule-approved psychological examinations—to find that Franqui is not mentally retarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.