DeLarue v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding erroneous admission of evidence regarding marijuana use was harmless where testimony at trial established appellant was highly intoxicated from alcohol
• “Accident analysts and reconstruction experts may be qualified to testify as to the cause of an accident if they are highly trained in the science of which they testify.”
• “Because there was no Daubert-Kelly hearing held to determine the reliability of the State’s marijuana evidence as it related to appellant’s intoxication and resultant behavior, we find the trial court erred in admitting this evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).