Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 5/15/1996

Westley v. Johnson

Citations

  • 83 F.3d 714
  • 1996 WL 252533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that failure to object to certain evidence did not prejudice the defendant, given other evidence of guilt
  • requiring a showing of a reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the jury’s verdict
  • noting that “claims that are not prejudicial cannot be cumulated, regardless of son No. 8-26 at 82, SHCR at 689 (Conclusions of Law on Material Fact Issue Number 5). the total number raised”
  • requiring a showing of a reasonable likelihood that the false testimony could have affected the jury’s verdict
  • finding no Brady violation where statements included in a suppressed offense report were contained in other records and testimony
  • no Brady violation where transcript of co-defendant’s case containing favorable information for defense was readily available

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Barksdale, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Westley v. Johnson

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.