Skip to main content
· 2/9/1994

Nordstrom v. State

Citations

  • 627 N.E.2d 1380
  • 1994 Ind. App. LEXIS 74
  • 1994 WL 32781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • officer did not present improper vouching testimony when he discussed statements he had made to defendant during the investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Barteau, Chezem

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.