Indiana Supreme Court· 3/20/2002
Saylor v. State
Citations
- 765 N.E.2d 535
- 2002 Ind. LEXIS 221
- 2002 WL 437963
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant did not show that the trial court relied improperly on his juvenile record in imposing sentence when the record showed that the defendant engaged in a number of acts as a juvenile that would have been crimes if committed by adults
- stating that “major participation in the killing” plus the requisite mental state are needed to establish § 35-50-2-9(b)(1)(G)— the aggravating factor of intentionally killing while commit- ting a robbery
- “Indeed, an adjudication itself may not be enough to prove a criminal history. However, ‘the acts committed by the juvenile may constitute a criminal history to support enhancement of a sentence.’ ([E]mphasis added
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rucker, Sullivan, Shepard, Dickson, Boehm
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pruitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2009-03-31· cited 450×
- Voss v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 379×
- Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 377×
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-06-26· cited 262×
- Overstreet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2007-11-27· cited 112×
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2002-07-08· cited 103×
- In Re the Marriage of NickelsIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-09-30· cited 52×
- AlliedSignal, Inc. v. OttIndiana Supreme Court· 2003-03-25· cited 46×
- Saylor v. IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-21· cited 45×
- State v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-05-25· cited 37×
- Strong v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-12· cited 37×
- Robert D. Davis v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 37×
- Darnell Williams v. Cecil Davis, Superintendent, Indiana State PrisonSeventh Circuit· 2002-08-29· cited 22×
- Shonelle Andre Jackson v. State of Alabama.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2009-11-13· cited 22×
- Jeffrey Archer v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 19×
- Slusher v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-03-21· cited 17×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-02-22· cited 16×
- Maroney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-26· cited 15×
- Hardebeck v. HardebeckIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-11-30· cited 15×
- In Re Custody of GjIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-09-30· cited 15×
Cites
99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-03-24· cited 2,200×
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 1,924×
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,614×
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 1,385×
- Tuilaepa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 983×
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court· 2000-05-22· cited 903×
- United States v. Sean Lamar Sanders, A/K/A Sean Lamont SandersFourth Circuit· 2001-04-13· cited 464×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.