Indiana Supreme Court· 8/20/2001

Timberlake v. State

Citations

753 N.E.2d 591
2001 Ind. LEXIS 737
2001 WL 936746

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is properly presented in a post-conviction proceeding if it was not presented on direct appeal
holding that issues available but not presented on direct appeal may not be presented for the first time in petition for post-conviction relief
holding that free-standing claims of error and issues that were known and available on direct appeal are not available in post-conviction proceedings
holding that issues that were known and available on direct appeal, but not raised, are waived
noting that most free-standing claims of error are not available in post- conviction proceedings because of the doctrines of waiver and res judicata
providing that “[i]f an issue was known and available, but not raised on direct appeal, it is waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

289 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Timberlake v. State

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.