Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 843 N.E.2d 50
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 326
  • 2006 WL 463858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the post-conviction court’s denial of defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was not clearly erroneous
  • recognizing that counsel will not be deemed ineffective for not anticipating or initiating changes in law
  • holding that the post-conviction court’s denial of defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel was not clearly erroneous
  • holding defendant waived a post-conviction claim on appeal when he had abandoned the claim in an amended petition for PCR
  • observing that issues not raised in a petition for post-conviction relief may not be raised for the first time on post-conviction appeal
  • noting that issues not raised in a petition for post- conviction relief are waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steve Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.