Skip to main content

Davenport v. State

Citations

  • 749 N.E.2d 1144
  • 2001 Ind. LEXIS 543
  • 2001 WL 722834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even if admission of testimony under the excited utterance exception was erroneous, the admission was cumulative and harmless
  • concluding that any error in admitting a statement as an excited utterance was harmless where the statement was \cumulative of [the declarant's trial] testimony and the 911 tape\
  • observing that statements made more than one-half hour after the startling event are generally not admissible as exeited utterances
  • finding direct evidence where son observed his mother being beaten by the defendant, sought to intervene but was struck by defendant and went to bed, and the next day the mother was found murdered by strangulation, which was not witnessed by the son
  • \It seems somewhat of a stretch to conclude that a statement [by a witness] one half-hour after the discovery of the body was still made under the stress of the startling event.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Sullivan, Rucker, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.