Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/6/2002

Ex Parte Taylor

Citations

101 S.W.3d 434
2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 216
2002 WL 31466434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that for collateral estoppel to apply, the issues in both cases must be “precisely” the same
providing that collateral estoppel is limited to cases where the factual and legal situations are identical
explaining that for collateral estoppel to apply, the issues in both cases must be “precisely” the same
stating that from the fact of appellant’s drinking, the jury could infer that he was intoxicated and that such intoxication was the cause of the accident
stating that from the fact of appellant's drinking, the jury could infer that he was intoxicated and that such intoxication was the cause of the accident
stating that from the fact of appellant's drinking, the jury could infer that he was intoxicated and that such intoxication was the cause of the accident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.