Ex Parte Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that PCR method has emerged as predominant method of DNA typing and is accepted in both forensic and non-forensic settings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hernandez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-06-04· cited 179×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-05-30· cited 83×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2003-12-02· cited 45×
• State v. Traylor
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-02-24· cited 28×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-08-27· cited 21×
• Yisrael v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 5×
• State v. Lomax
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-11-28· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• People v. Shreck
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2001-05-14· cited 854×
• State v. Russell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
• United States v. Reginald Pierre Beasley, United States of America v. Oliver Lawrence Beasley
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-01-22· cited 141×
• Maples v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-03-26· cited 89×
• Simmons v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 85×
• State v. Butterfield
  Utah Supreme Court· 2001-07-10· cited 71×
• Turner v. State
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-01-16· cited 44×
• United States v. Trala
  D. Delaware· 2001-09-17· cited 31×
• People v. Hill
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-05-16· cited 24×
• Lemour v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-28· cited 14×