Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 74 S.W.3d 19
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 85
  • 2002 WL 662532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court abused its discretion in failing to conduct hearing on new-trial motion, reversing court of appeals, and remanding with instructions to abate appeal and remand cause to trial court to conduct hearing on new-trial motion
  • stating that affidavit must demonstrate that reasonable grounds for new trial exist and that alleged grounds are true
  • explaining that “[t]he particulars of . . . the plea offer . . . are among the factual matters that should be fully developed at a hearing”
  • noting that particulars 12 of when plea offer was conveyed and amount of time it remained available are factual matters to be developed at hearing for motion for new trial
  • stating that, in order to warrant a hearing on a motion for new trial, “the supporting affidavit must reflect that reasonable grounds exist for holding that such relief should be granted”
  • stating that, in order to warrant a hearing on a motion for new trial, \the supporting affidavit must reflect that reasonable grounds exist for holding that such relief should be granted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Keller, Meyers, Price, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.