Skip to main content

Thomas v. State

Citations

  • 65 S.W.3d 38
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 111
  • 2001 WL 1474155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding wh ether court of appeals erred in evidence-sufficiency review by employing impermissibly restrictive definition of statutory term
  • deciding whether court of appeals erred in evidence- sufficiency review by employing impermissibly restrictive definition of statutory term
  • analyzing whether the term “evidence of indebtness” as used in the definition of security in the Texas Securities Act requires a writing
  • defining the principle as one interpreting general words that follow an enumeration of particular or specific things by confining the meaning of the general words to things of the same kind
  • defining the principle as one interpreting general words that follow an enumeration of particular or specific things by confining the meaning of the general words to things of the same kind
  • defining the principle as one interpreting general words that follow an enumeration of particular or specific things by confining the meaning of the general words to things of the same kind

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.