Eric Jenkins v. Lt. Haubert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that some federal remedy \must be available\ and if habeas corpus is not, it must be § 1983
• “[Nothing in Supreme Court precedent requires that the Heck rule be applied to a challenge by a prisoner to a term of disciplinary segregation[.]”
• “We do not rest our holding solely on our tally of votes' on the [Supreme] Court for Justice Souter’s view of Heck.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).