Sandin v. Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoner had no liberty interest for the purpose of the due process clause, but that he may nonetheless challenge arbitrary state action under the equal protection clause
• noting that the 1 Cir. 2012
• “Discipline by prison officials in response to a wide range of 7 misconduct falls within the expected parameters of the sentence imposed by a court of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).