Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 3/18/1998

Arce v. Walker

Citations

  • 139 F.3d 329
  • 1998 WL 119612

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Sandin applies to determine whether placement in non-punitive segregation implicates a protected liberty interest
  • finding that deprivation of exercise and access to communal religious services during an eighteen-day segregation was not an atypical and significant hardship
  • finding that eighteen days in administrative segregation, including loss of exercise and access to religious services, did not constitute atypical and significant hardship
  • finding that eighteen days in administrative segregation, including loss of exercise and access to religious services, did not constitute atypical and significant hardship
  • upholding the dismissal of a plaintiff’s due process claim where the plaintiff alleged he was deprived of exercise for 15 days
  • affirming dismissal of claim where the plaintiff asserted that the “depriv[ation] of exercise and access to communal religious services . . . caused him to suffer an ‘atypical and significant’ hardship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Meskill, Oakes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Arce v. Walker

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.