Anthony Dewalt v. Lamark Carter, Correctional Officer Young, Carol Biester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that shoving a prisoner into a doorframe, which resulted in bruising on his back, did not state a constitutional violation
• holding that shoving a prisoner into a doorframe, which resulted in bruising on his back, did not state a constitutional violation
• holding that “[t]he use of racially derogatory language, while unprofessional and deplorable, does not violate the Constitution”
• holding that shoving a prisoner into a doorframe, which resulted in bruising on his back, did not state a constitutional violation
• holding that shoving a prisoner into a doorframe, which resulted in bruising on his back, did not state a constitutional violation
• holding that shoving a prisoner into a doorframe, which resulted in bruising on his back, did not state a constitutional violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).