Narvis G. Nonnette v. Larry Small R. Schelke E. Castro D. Johnson M.A. Corbin J. Builtman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff could proceed with § 1983 action because habeas relief was no longer available
• recognizing that an inmate seeking to challenge the denial of credits to reduce his sentence \must proceed in habeas corpus\
• holding that 12 plaintiff could proceed with § 1983 action because habeas relief was no longer available
• holding that plaintiff could proceed with § 1983 action because habeas relief was no longer available
• holding that 24 plaintiff, who lacked a remedy in habeas, was entitled to proceed with a civil rights action
• declining to apply the favorable-termination requirement where the plaintiff could not pursue habeas relief because he had been released from jail

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).