Joshua Liner v. Glenn Goord Walter Kelly Gilmore, Sgt. John Doe 1 John Doe 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and § 1997e dismissals are subject to de novo review
• recognizing that the law concerning the PLRA's \action . . . with respect to prison conditions\ language was in flux, but refusing to resolve the question \without the benefit of a more complete record\
• recognizing that the law concerning the PLRA's \action . . . with respect to prison conditions\ language was in flux, but refusing to resolve the question \without the benefit of a more complete record\
• noting that law concerning PLRA exhaustion requirement is in “great flux,” but declining to address issue given nature of record on appeal
• explaining that, under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, sua sponte dismissal of frivolous prisoner complaints is mandatory
• explaining that, under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, sua sponte dismissal of frivolous prisoner complaints is mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).